Intelligent Information Access Techniques for on-line Health Information Search: a Survey of Non-Physicians



Iris Julia Elene Wilke Van Der Heijden*, Health on the net Foundation, Chene-Bourg, Switzerland
Natalia Pletneva, Health on the net Foundation, Chene-Bourg, Switzerland
Lonneke Van Der Plas, IMS - University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Celia Boyer, Health on the net Foundation, Chene-Bourg, Switzerland


Track: Research
Presentation Topic: Search, Collaborative Filtering and Recommender Technologies
Presentation Type: Poster presentation
Submission Type: Single Presentation

Last modified: 2012-09-13
qrcode

If you are the presenter of this abstract (or if you cite this abstract in a talk or on a poster), please show the QR code in your slide or poster (QR code contains this URL).

Abstract


Objective:
In on-line health information search, the need for Intelligent Information Access (IIA) techniques is particularly strong because the available information varies widely on the level of quality, trustworthiness, and readability. On-going research has been showing poor quality and low relevance of the search results using popular search engines for a range of health conditions, often not suitable for a person without health science background. The aim of the study was to identify current difficulties encountered by non-physicians and possible improvements IIA techniques could bring.
Methods:
A web-based questionnaire was developed and made publicly accessible during 2 months in 2011. We mainly promoted the questionnaire via the HONcode certified web sites and social media. We applied descriptive statistics, and ANOVA analysis and post-hoc comparisons with Tukey method to reveal differences between population groups.
Results: We received answers from 385 respondents (at least 90% of answered questions) of mostly highly educated (79% with university degree) Internet savvy European users. 30% of the respondents work in healthcare (other but physicians), 21% have computer and mathematical occupations, or work in education and training (13%). 51% (N=194) stated “sometimes” having difficulties to find an answer. Relevance of matches (83%, N=379), questionable trustworthiness (81%, N=374), quality and completeness of description (75%, N=363), overload with information quantity (72%, N=372) and lack of quality filter (69%, N=365) are the top-5 difficulties respondents face at least sometimes. Desired functionalities imply personalization, categorization of results, cross-language access, recommender system and interactive query reformulation.
Conclusion:
The survey has aggregated the opinions of highly educated frequent searchers of online health information. We have identified several limitations of current search engines for the task of on-line health information search, that can be tackled by IIA techniques mentioned above.
Practice Implications:
There is a need to work towards personalized solutions which provide users with trustworthy information to help them make informed health decisions. This is the goal of the EU project KHRESMOI (2010-2014|FP7:257528).
Keywords:
Online health information search, Intelligent Information Access techniques, survey, non-physicians




Medicine 2.0® is happy to support and promote other conferences and workshops in this area. Contact us to produce, disseminate and promote your conference or workshop under this label and in this event series. In addition, we are always looking for hosts of future World Congresses. Medicine 2.0® is a registered trademark of JMIR Publications Inc., the leading academic ehealth publisher.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.