Research
Applications submitted in the research track typically have a hypothesis (or research question), present data, and synthesize the results into meaningful conclusions. Abstracts in the research track have higher acceptance standards and must be structured into Background, Objective, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. Each section should start with the respective heading in the same line (e.g. ";Background: The Internet has become...";). DO NOT CAPITALIZE THE SECTION HEADINGS (e.g. do not write ";BACKGROUND:";, but ";Background:";). In the results section, make sure to include relevant statistics, if applicable, such as sample sizes, response rates, P-values or Confidence Intervals.
 Open Submissions |
Peer Reviewed |
Practice
Applications submitted in the practice track typically reflect academically-focused work developed to address a particular need or purpose, with qualitative results and/or discussion of how the work fits into the larger body of work in Medicine 2.0.
| Open Submissions |
Peer Reviewed |
Business
Work that reflects a commercial business need or interest should be presented in the business track. Work presented by a commercial interest or applicable to business (e.g. Startup Pitches) should also be presented in the Business track.
| Open Submissions |
Peer Reviewed |
Medicine 2.0® is happy to support and promote other conferences and workshops in this area. Contact us to produce, disseminate and promote your conference or workshop under this label and in this event series. In addition, we are always looking for hosts of future World Congresses. Medicine 2.0® is a registered trademark of JMIR Publications Inc., the leading academic ehealth publisher.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.